Works (Laws, Definitions)

and James Adam. I personally collated the Timaeus, Critias, Laws III–XII, Epinomis, Epistles, and the Spurious Works (cf. Preface to Vol. IV).

B.—In all the dialogues except the Statesman, Parmenides, and Philebus, the collations of Schanz were available for the Clarkianus 39 manuscript. W. W. Waddell had thoroughly examined the Parmenides. I personally collated the Statesman and the Philebus. However, since I realized rather late that the corrections of the old corrector (B²) and those of the later hand (b) had been noted by Schanz with insufficient care, I endeavored to remedy this defect from Tetralogy V onwards, and in Tetralogy I, which was reprinted in 1905.

T.—Schanz had edited Tetralogy I before he understood the excellence of the Venetian App. Class. 4, 1 manuscript, but later, when he was editing the Euthyphro, Apology, and Crito again for the use of schools, he also employed this book. I was the first to publish its readings for the Phaedo, as well as for the Statesman and Philebus, which had not yet been edited by Schanz.

W.—I became acquainted with the Vienna manuscript (suppl. phil. gr. 7)—a book unjustly neglected by Schanz, as it is now almost universally agreed—partly from his own edition and partly from the collations of the most learned Joseph Král, which he kindly shared with me. In the Sophist, I used the edition of Apelt. In the reprint of Tetralogy I in 1905, I also utilized the testimony of this book for the Phaedo.

P.—Petrus S. McIntyre collated the Palatine Vatican excerpts (173) for my use, and I utilized his collation for the Gorgias and Timaeus.

F.—Schneider had collated the Vienna manuscript suppl. phil. gr. 39 for the Republic; from this collation, I understood