ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS

IN THE CRITICAL ANNOTATION

Having found an opportunity while a new impression is being issued from the printer's hive, I have corrected or added a few things in the plays themselves, and several in the notes. Here, I have indicated more items that seem to require correction or addition in the notes.

W. M. LINDSAY.

Year 1910, from the University of St Andrews.

MIL. 101 ADD. 101 As in the manuscripts of Donatus on the Adelphi I. i. 25, "which love is" original: "qui amor est" as seen (cf. Berlin Philological Weekly 26, 17)
149 READ not Priscian I, 200, but cf. Thulin on conjunctions, p. 157
240 FOR OR "lactest" READ perhaps "than it is milk" (or "lactest") of milk
304 AFTER "e" ADD. Camerarius ADD. (cf. Classical Review 19, 110)
361 ADD. : "who is there?" Skutsch (Glotta I, 315)
379 FOR "fenestra" in the manuscripts READ fenestra in the manuscripts: or "festra"
480 AFTER (pro -ret?) ADD. , which is defended by Blase, On the permutation of moods, p. 18
488 AFTER (cf. 490) ADD. perhaps for "in the way"
631 ADD. hardly "albicapillust"
731 AFTER "om. P" ADD. , perhaps correctly.
812 AFTER "A n. l." ADD. Cf. Sjögren ("Future in Old Latin," p. 15)
843 AFTER "Ritschl" ADD. , Sjögren ("Future in Old Latin," p. 190)
863 AFTER "quot tu" manuscript ADD. (cf. Classical Review 19, 110)
897 AFTER "incedit" manuscript ADD. (cf. Poen. 577 "incedit" for "cedit" in P)
920 ADD. since Durham ("Subject Substantive Clauses," p. 87)
926 FOR "perhaps" READ hardly
1005 AFTER "iliam" manuscript ADD. "tuis" ] tueris Cannegieter on the forms of the future perfect, p. 102
1033 FOR "perhaps" READ hardly
1042 AFTER "Camerarius" ADD. , but cf. Classical Review 19, 110
1061 AFTER "suspectum" ADD. : perhaps "only" (used to point out deiktikos demonstrative/pointing out)
1071 AFTER "quod" manuscript ADD. , which is defended by Gaffiot ("Subjunctive Subordination," p. 202)
1072 AFTER "me B" ADD. : "since" (delete "me") Gaffiot
1231 AFTER "for the sake of the meter" ADD. , but cf. Radford (Transactions of the American Philological Association 35, 47)
1253 AFTER "Leo" ADD. (but cf. Cist. 132)
1278 AFTER "sunt" ADD. Perhaps "of the dowry"
1359 ADD. "obliscendi" must be pronounced
1389 ADD. 1389 "stātu" is disapproved by Marx (ad Lucilius 28, 794)

MOST. (Personae) ADD. THEOPROPIDES] Theoropides (Theu-) manuscripts, as seen, which is defended by Sonnenschein (Classical Review 20, 448)