I. What if the celebrant, after consecration, perceives that water had not been mixed with the wine.
II. Whether the celebrant is always bound to consume the consecrated wine or the blood of Christ.
III. What if some priest cannot consume wine and thus cannot consume the blood.
IIII. What if, when the blood ought to be consumed, the species of wine is frozen.
Doubt V V. What if a spider, fly, or something of that sort has fallen into the blood.
VI. What if, before consumption, the celebrant perceives that poison has been introduced.
VII. What if the blood has been spilled in part or has dripped from the chalice.
VIII. What if the blood has been spilled entirely.

Art. VI.

Resolves 6 doubts that occur regarding the blood after its consumption.

I. What if the priest, after the consumption of the blood, perceives some drop adhering to the chalice.
II. What if he perceives such a drop adhering to the chasuble, maniple, or another thing of that sort.
Doubt III. Regarding the ablution of the fingers to be done over the chalice after the consumption of the blood.
IIII. Regarding him who, after the consumption of the body or blood of Christ, is urged to spit, cough, or clear his throat.
V. Regarding one suffering vomiting after the consumption of the blood or emitting it through the bowels.
VI. What if the priest, after the consumption of the blood, discovers that there was poison or a poisonous animal in the chalice.

Chapter eight comprises 2 articles.

Art. I.

Resolves 16 doubts emerging regarding the form of the consecration of the bread.

I. What is the sufficient and due form of the consecration of the bread.
II. Whether this conjunction, "For" (Enim), is of the substance of the form.
Doubt III III. Whether a priest pronouncing only the words of consecration over apt bread consecrates it.
IIII. Whether, by those words changed into another idiom, the consecration is effected.