This library is built in the open.
If you spot an error, have a suggestion, or just want to say hello — we’d love to hear from you.

trivial matters arise, should it be printed in its entirety and without omissions, or should it be communicated to the public with some selection? —
It is perhaps not unwelcome to many of Andreae’s friends today if I append here, by way of conclusion, a list of those writings which, more than other less important ones, can be considered as auxiliary tools for the history of Andreae. I assume that what both Carolus Charles, father and son, Fiſchlin, Weiſſmann, Clemm, and others, and most recently the author of the short biographies of famous Württembergers (Stuttgart, 1791) have collected *) for the memory of Andreae, is generally known,
*) compare Ph. Heinr. Schuler’s History of the Changes in Taste in Preaching. First Part, pp. 166–175, and in the documents, No. XVI, pp. 300 ff.
and I will therefore only explicitly name the following writings: