This library is built in the open.
If you spot an error, have a suggestion, or just want to say hello — we’d love to hear from you.

foreign to the senses and abstracted from the imagination, and they are categorized and understood in their own proper intelligible. The second rule of K has four species, namely when it is asked with what the intellect is, and with what a part is in a part, and parts in a whole, and the whole in its parts, and with what it transmits its likeness outside. To this, it must be answered that it is with its correlatives, without which it can neither exist nor understand. For it understands with foreign species, from which it makes an instrument for understanding. We have spoken of the rules with which the intellect resolves questions by deducing them through the rules, regarding what the rule and its species signify, subjectively deducing the question through the principles and rules, with the intellect objecting to that dubitable question with the definitions of the principles, choosing by understanding intelligibly the affirmative or the negative, and so the intellect itself is separated from doubt.
This table is the subject in which the intellect makes itself universal, because it understands and abstracts from it many dangers of all matters, running through the principles objectively through the particulars and applying the rules subjectively to every question, declaring the question, and from