On the Mysteries

...the order, and the being to the worse servants and the things themselves. But not at the same time to all, from those turning back toward it, to which [are] the needs. It is shown then clearly, that such a bodily vision is false. But it was necessary to have considered [that] we promised nothing of the sort. But since this has been decided, I pass on to that of the account. Since the original: "kentsopsia" (likely a scribal error for "kenodoxia", empty opinion)...

After your god, you will look upon [what] heals [and what] will be refuted.

missing

...that is, refuting. Of some good, this aim, that [one] not admit the false [things] not knowing that it rejoices in this itself and in the truth; but to know in whole or [to know] all changes of itself [as] essence to the bodies of [a certain] quality, or having nothing new [it] admits the bodies participating in it. But how then does the presence with them distinguish the bodily places. Or [the one] not delineated by separate boundaries will sit under; for indeed also...
from parts

...made [it] has received the whole to be favored interpreting the Latin/Greek context of divine favor or order. And it does not wish to proceed. And the [things] according to one into the births of the bodies, so that also a disproportionate giving back of the essence. For more reasonably [one would say] this [is] the work of the whole abundance of them and [is] described in the [parts] sought. And that which is truly being will make itself of bodies, everywhere it is wherever it might wish. But the divine [is] again everywhere...

Whence also the cause.

As if one through the years [might see] the divine.

...producing, being exceeded by the perfection of the whole of the world and to be sensed by some, it is contained by it. For this reason he also said, and I did not give to a part of the whole. For [it is] not to me [that] in some place these things are created and [they] are yoked under. But the no miracle, and the sharing of these same things, extends through the whole of the world. But in general of the partial nature and of the god, for not [similar] to the divinity [in] communion, but [it] is of nature this very opinion. To the superior presence, finding outside of the earth. For neither does he say, or that it wanders separately, or that it is mixed unequally. And as he said with it is [the one] of the creation. Nor indeed [in] the hands, for nothing of the gods [is] divided according to this...