Second Commentary on the Doctrine of Abstinence

urges this, and the matter itself demands that we do not allow the shades of those whose memory, on account of their generous institution that embraced both divine and human honor, will cling not only to the speech and minds of the Saxons but also to those of all nations, to be rashly disturbed. Tiberius Caesar thought it of great importance that, whenever he might die, the mention of him should be made without insult or slander, and that allies and citizens should follow the deeds and fame of his name with praise and good remembrances. But if a Prince, tainted by many vices, took care for his memory after death, how much more justly should this be done for virtue, ennobled by many merits and the greatest things? Solon certainly enacted and carefully provided for this law, which Demosthenes commemorates in his oration against Leptines, that the dead should not be attacked by the stigmas of slander. For the same reason, every best man of the Saxons considers it to be in his interest to protect and defend the reputation of his ancestors, which is superior to any kind of eulogy or ambition. Certainly, we would incur the mark of an ungrateful spirit if we let slip even one opportunity to recall the virtues of the first Elector Princes of Saxony in our Academy, founded and amplified by the liberality and benefits of these Princes; in our Academy, a champion and nurturer alike of such ancient and famous renown, of a restored religion and doctrine; in our Academy, which [cultivates] the virtue of its Princes...