This library is built in the open.
If you spot an error, have a suggestion, or just want to say hello — we’d love to hear from you.

...he has divided the feud with his brother, and he who has received the part of the feud later has sold more than half and has died without a legitimate heir, the feud returns to the lord. Likewise, if someone has had a feud in the court of his lord: he will not be able to give that feud in any part by "libellarius" name to anyone without the consent of his lord, or to obligate it for a pledge. Similarly, if he has held it outside the court, and the lord has held jurisdiction or another honor: if he has alienated it without his consent, it returns to the lord by law.
c "sine Domini voluntate." Cujac. "vicinus." & c. "dominum," dist. 89. But Hotoman thinks this to be the same as he who is later called "praepositus" (provost), because he demands ecclesiastical revenues from the plebs, that is, from the bailiffs and coloni.
A bishop, abbot, or abbess, or lord of a parish cannot henceforth enfeoff the properties of the churches subject to them, which are called titles. Bald.
Likewise, if a bishop, abbot, or abbess, or lord of a parish has given a feud of the properties of the churches which are subject to them, and are called titles: it has no force, according to that which was established by Pope Urban in the holy synod, that is, that which was given after his decree; that which was given before, however, must firmly remain. The same law applies if he is a provost [or abbess] or another ecclesiastical person, who has not been accustomed from ancient times to give in feud: namely, that what he has given does not hold by law.
A woman placed in a union with a male does not succeed together with him, but only if there is no male. Bald.
1
¶ Furthermore, if someone has received a feud on the condition that his descendants, males and females, might have it: once a male is left, females are not admitted further.
2
e Cujac. "paternum," but I have a manuscript book in which it is read thus: he speaks in no way if the feud...
¶ A mute cannot retain a feud, namely he who speaks in no way. But if the feud was large, from which, if taken away, he cannot provide for himself: so much ought to be left to him whereby he can sustain himself. And in all these cases the feud is lost and returns to the lord.