V I T A.

...and the one which is for Rabirius. Thus, by this demonstration of his, he inflamed the minds of the adolescents with such a desire for listening and progressing that the royal school, although most ample for listening, for the most part could not contain the crowd and frequency of the auditors. Here, poets, historians, orators, and philosophers themselves permitted their riches and wealth, the ornaments and lights of his speech, oration, and reasoning, to be contemplated and enjoyed. From this, his more accurate instruction and demonstration of the arts, and his freer commentary and meditation against their teachers, later emerged. Therefore, from that principle of acting well and artificially, USE, the Ciceronianus The Ciceronian arose (which he later published in the year 1556), which would indicate by the example of Cicero’s institute the pure and sincere way of educating youth well, and would explain many vices of instruction common throughout all gymnasia in individual arts. But the Ciceronianus was a sort of common herald and exhortator for the love of the liberal arts; the chief points of praise for each, and their own encomia, redounded from that same source of USE. The boundaries of the artificial curriculum were bounded and defined by the exoteric external/introductory kind, while the remaining space up to the goal was terminated and defined by the acroamatic advanced/esoteric kind. That exoteric kind embraced grammar, rhetoric, and logic; he instituted a double commentary for these arts (as also for all the others): the one apodictic demonstrative, by which the truth and utility of the arts are demonstrated; the other elenctic refutative, by which the vanity of contrary opinions is refuted; of which kind are the schools of grammar, rhetoric, logic, physics, metaphysics, and mathematics. Therefore, the grammar of both languages—but of Latin (because it was of greater necessity in our Europe)—was explained diligently, not only according to the authority of the ancient grammarians, but also according to the accurate norm of true use, so that, filled in all its parts, it might become, in one compendium of legitimate order, by far shorter and easier than it had been before. And so that the new form of the new building might be approved by just judges, the schools of grammar discussed the cause of each place most amply. Therefore, this was Ramus’s contention in grammar, in which it is worth the effort to consider certain of his new inventions and his correction of corrupted pronunciation.

Ciceronianus