This library is built in the open.
If you spot an error, have a suggestion, or just want to say hello — we’d love to hear from you.

personal and real [assumption].
XXXVI.
It is therefore truly strange that the Ubiquitarians so often deny a physical mixture or communication of divine properties into the humanity, yet they are not ashamed to allege, even in their own public writing (which is nevertheless held by them as most authentic above all others), the very words and authority of Luther, concerning whom it is admitted that he wrote that the two natures are mixed not into one substance, but into one person. Moreover, they falsely boast that the orthodox of the ancient Church, repeatedly, both before and after the Council of Chalcedon, used the word "mixture" in a good sense.
XXXVII.
This, indeed, if we press the words, cannot be denied. But that was written by them (which the adversaries themselves are forced to admit even against their will) in a new sense.
XXXVIII.
By no means, however, in such a sense as the Ubiquitarians have devised in the last few years.
XXXIX.
Wherefore it is in vain that the Ubiquitarians defend, by this or that reason or authority of this or that person, their ubiquity, which they have fashioned and devised themselves.