Annotatio secunda Gregorii de Valentia societatis Iesu de controversia ubiquetaria

(...at one TIME) ...to be visible in the heavens, while in other places (for these were his words) it is invisible. If the reader compares this corruption diligently and accurately with our Thesis, I have no doubt that he will judge that either a crime of falsehood was never committed by anyone, or it was committed by Schmidelin in this place. For how could he defend that we asserted the body of Christ cannot be visible and invisible in one and the same place, and that it cannot be visible in heaven and invisible in other places at one time, which he falsely pretended we posited in that Thesis?

Schmidelin hides, he does not clear away the crime charged to him. Page 11.

However, since this man could in no way clear away this crime of falsehood, he attempted at least to cover it up. Thus, he does not distinctly commemorate this second crime, just as I had distinctly objected to him; but he confuses it with the first and says that I am accusing him here on the grounds that he asserts that the Jesuits, in that Thesis 93, teach that the body of Christ is circumscribed wherever it is. But I did not object to this, at least regarding this Thesis; nor did I divine, as he falsely and ridiculously narrates, that Thesis 93 was the one in which he would have thought we affirmed that. But I accused him most justly of a crime of falsehood for the second time, as it pertains to Thesis 93, because he clearly asserted that we taught in this Thesis that the body of Christ cannot be visible in heaven and invisible in other places. I affirm that he cannot defend by any art of caviling that this was posited by us in that Thesis. Although we did not say that either—not in that Thesis nor anywhere else (as I demonstrated before)—that Christ's body is circumscribed wherever it is, but that it cannot be circumscribed and uncircumscribed in one and the same place: which is a very different thing. But here I demand from Schmidelin that he defend that what he wrote—that we affirm in Thesis 93—is contained in it, unless he wishes to be held as a forger: namely, that the body of Christ cannot be visible in heaven and invisible in other places. I repeat this crime of his the more willingly the more studiously he hid it, so that its foulness would not be seen. For if you studiously re-read the pages 11, 12, 13, 14, and 15 of his booklet, in which...

Page 10.