... Pro consequendis in u.i. doctoralibus insigniis & privilegiis ... subsequentes LXXXVI. theses de interdictis cum octo parergis

XXX.
Can it not be doubted without merit whether this Interdict is also granted for feudal things? And we judge, with the common opinion of the Doctors, that it should also be extended to those things.

XXXI.
Most closely related to this Interdict is the Petition for inheritance, which matches with this "useful" interdict, and that useful one matches with this direct one: although this interdict also differs from it in many things.

XXXII.
The second interdict for the Acquiring of possession is QUOD LEGATORUM That Which Concerns Legacies, and it is named from the first words of the interdict. For the Praetor says: WHAT OF THE LEGACIES, BY THE WILL OF THE ONE TO WHOM THIS THING PERTAINS, NAMELY THE HEIR OR THE POSSESSOR OF THE GOODS, SOMEONE HAS OCCUPIED, OR HAS MALICIOUSLY CEASED TO POSSESS, THAT YOU SHALL RESTORE TO HIM. UNLESS SECURITY HAS BEEN GIVEN IN THE NAME OF THE LEGACIES, I WILL SEND HIM INTO POSSESSION.

XXXIII.
There are two parts to this Interdict, the first of which forces a legatee, even if he is the civil owner, to restore a thing occupied by his own authority because of the Falcidian Fourth the portion of an estate reserved for the heir to the heir or the possessor of the goods.

XXXIV.
Whence it may be asked not without merit: Does this interdict harm a legatee who occupies it by the will of the heir or the testator? And I fearlessly grant that it does not harm him, unless the heir consented before the inheritance was entered.

XXXV.
Similarly, it also does not harm a legatee, due to the danger consisting in delay, either when the heir does not yet exist, or truly in a case where the Falcidian portion...