... Pro consequendis in u.i. doctoralibus insigniis & privilegiis ... subsequentes LXXXVI. theses de interdictis cum octo parergis

UTROBI. For the Praetor says: IN WHICH OF THE TWO referring to which party possessed the item THIS PERSON, ABOUT WHOM THE MATTER IS, WAS FOR THE GREATER PART OF THIS YEAR, I FORBID FORCE TO BE USED TO PREVENT HIM FROM TAKING HIM.

LVI.
This interdict is given to the possessor of movable things against a disturber, for the same purpose for which the UTI POSSIDETIS interdict is given.

LVII.
Indeed, there is no difference today between these two interdicts, except that this one is given for movable things, and that one for immovable things.

LVIII.
For it is given not to the one who possessed for the greater part of the year, but to the one who possesses at the time the lawsuit is finally contested; although by Canon law, it suffices to prove the longer possession in this interdict just as in UTI POSSIDETIS.

LIX.
There are indeed many interdicts for Retaining possession, such as: LEST FORCE BE USED AGAINST HIM: CONCERNING SURFACES: CONCERNING A PRIVATE RIGHT OF WAY: CONCERNING DAILY AND SUMMER WATER: CONCERNING CHANNELS: CONCERNING A SPRING: CONCERNING SEWERS, etc. But since these are special interdicts and are given only in certain cases, examining each one is not our purpose.

LX.
After the Interdicts for Acquiring and Retaining possession, the Interdict for Recovering possession follows by right. Because its cause is very frequent, it has many related remedies, and it is called by the first words of the interdict, UNDE VI From where by force.

LXI.
The Praetor says: FROM WHERE YOU HAVE EXPELLED HIM BY FORCE, OR YOUR FAMILY HAS EXPELLED HIM, AND CONCERNING THAT WHICH HE THEN HAD THERE, I WILL GIVE JUDGMENT ONLY WITHIN THE YEAR; BUT AFTER A YEAR, CONCERNING THAT WHICH CAME TO HIM WHO EXPELLED BY FORCE.