... Pro consequendis in u.i. doctoralibus insigniis & privilegiis ... subsequentes LXXXVI. theses de interdictis cum octo parergis

LXII.
This interdict is competent for the possessor who has been ejected from possession by another, whether by public or private force; whom, according to the Doctors, we call the "spoiled" party, while the one who ejects or causes the ejection, we name the Spoiler.

LXIII.
And we do not distinguish here whether one possessed naturally or only civilly, or indeed naturally and civilly at the same time, provided only that he was ejected by force. We must understand force not as simple, but as atrocious a term for aggravated, violent, or armed force.

LXIIII.
We want this interdict to be given not only to possessors, but also to detainees, if they hold in their own name and not another's, such as a usufructuary, a vassal, and finally, an emphyteutic holder.

LXV.
We also think, with Bartolus, that this interdict, albeit a useful one, is given to those who are ejected from the quasi-possession of some incorporeal right or jurisdiction.

LXVI.
Moreover, we conclude with the common school of Doctors that this interdict is also competent for a robber, so that he may be restored before all else.

LXVII.
This interdict is competent against him who himself ejected the possessor by force, or ordered him to be ejected, or ratified the ejection, or fraudulently persuaded it; or finally, against him whose family ejected the possessor.

LXVIII.
And we must say that this judgment is given not only against the one who ejected through an agent, but also against the agent himself; yet in such a way that by the satisfaction of one, the other is liberated.