... Pro consequendis in u.i. doctoralibus insigniis & privilegiis ... subsequentes LXXXVI. theses de interdictis cum octo parergis

LXIX.
Furthermore, this interdict is given against the lord himself, so that he may restore the possession to the spoiled party before all else. Justinian the 6th-century Byzantine emperor and codifier of law expanded his constitution in such a way that he loses not only possession, but even the thing itself, if it is his own; if not, he must provide the valuation of the thing.

LXX.
This interdict is given to heirs, and similarly against an heir or universal successor, insofar as it came to him.

LXXI.
But can it be doubtful whether it is given against a singular successor? However, we shall defend that it is not given, for certain causes and reasons.

LXXII.
It is competent for Recovering the possession of all immovable things that were with the possessor at the time of the ejection, together with fruits, damages, and accession.

LXXIII.
And these are to be restored, not only if they exist, but even if they perished without fault and delay; since a violent possessor is always considered to be in delay.

LXXIIII.
We do not believe this interdict is given for the lost possession of movable things, since there are other sufficient remedies, unless the movable things come into the consequence of the immovable thing being restored.

LXXV.
This action is given within a useful year regarding all goods; after a year, it is also given regarding those things that came to the possessor or his heirs.

LXXVI.
Let this suffice regarding the interdict UNDE VI; to which, because of the hatred of violence, most opulent remedies have been added by Emperors, as well as by Pontiffs, so that, this being left aside, the others are more in use.