This library is built in the open.
If you spot an error, have a suggestion, or just want to say hello — we’d love to hear from you.

"Within"—this refers to the fullness of the "I-consciousness." Its form is nothing other than bliss, which is self-luminous. Because it is formless, it is free from the projection of space and time—the "before" and "after," the "distant" or "near." It does not possess a specific "region" (like a place) or a "destination" (a goal that can be pointed to as "this"). Therefore, it is impossible to designate; it is beyond the scope of middle-level speech. For this reason, it is inexpressible, not even to be described by the vaikhari gross/articulate speech. In the highest sense—that is, in its true reality—it is so; however, through the imagination—by treating the distant as if it were close—it can be designated and described in accordance with the aforementioned method. That is what he says: "That state"—the state of the Bhairava-self, the experiencer—the power that is non-different from me—